Nevada Supreme Court Put
JUSTICE for Sale – Wells Fargo is the highest bidder
$243,000 underwater as soon as we
signed Wells Fargo's loan contract before the ink dried.
Attorney General suspended Wells Fargo hand-picked
appraiser’s license for committing appraisal fraud on our home.
Wells Fargo admitted that the mortgage loan
shouldn’t be originated in the first place and promised to buy back its
fraudulent loan in 2006.
In 2010, despite our repeated plea and total cash
payments of $350,000, Wells Fargo still chose to wrongfully foreclose our home.
I confronted Wells Fargo CEO in person last year,
asked him not to steal our home. He had policemen arrested me instead.
Mega Trillion Wells Fargo Turns United States of America
into Lawless Wild, Wild West:
Washoe County 2nd District Court Chief Judge
Connie Steinheimer, Judge Robert Perry and Nevada Supreme Court Chief Judge
Cherry, Judge Douglas, Judge Saitta, Judge Gibbons, Judge Pickering, Judge
Hardesty and Judge Parraguirre put Justice for sale.
What does material facts and rules of law mean to our modern
day Nevada Supreme Court Judges? - Law & Order is not designed for
the undeserving working Americans. Law & Order is designed to protect
the mega banksters to steal freely without any obstruction of working
Chief Judge Connie Steinheimer
told me that “there are NO LAWS in United States governing the appraisal and
mortgage fraud situation we are in.” and called me Gandhi for advocating and
exposing Wells Fargo’s banking abuse. When we immediately requested the
Chief Judge Connie Steinheimer to record the conversation, she refused.
When you’ve got money you can afford to ignore the
consumers. When you have money you can afford to ignore the law.
This is a tactic that Wells Fargo does across the nation
because simply it can, and because it has the money. Having the money
doesn’t mean that you are right. Justice is not to be sold to the highest
Judges are bound ‘to preserve and improve our justice system
in order to assure a free and just society under the law.’ It says
nothing about a pocketbook. It doesn’t say if you’ve got more thousands
in your back pocket that you should prevail. That seems to have been the
trend of Wells Fargo, though. Too many cases have been filed and lost by
plaintiffs who have first time been defrauded by Wells Fargo.
The moral of my story is: when consumers go to court there
is no justice. What would 311 million Americans feel or … if they knew
that that is the fact, perhaps not only with Wells Fargo, but with all the
other Wall Street banks? We all know that they run the show. Is it
just? Is it right? It is not.
I’ve already gone into the injuries that I and my family
have suffered as a result of their fraud. It is not just money. It
is not just the Vieiras.
The most disturbing is Wells Fargo’s admission of errors
and refusal to voluntarily correct its errors. It prefers to rely on the
ignorance of borrowers or their inability to fund a challenge to its demands,
rather than voluntarily relinquish gains obtained through improper loan
origination and wrongful foreclosure.
Wells Fargo’s conduct was a breach of its contractual obligations to its
borrowers. More importantly, when exposed, it revealed its true corporate
character by denying any obligation to correct its past transgressions and
mounting a legal assault ensure it never had to. Society requires that those in
business conduct themselves with honestly and fair dealing.
Wells Fargo’s actions were not only highly reprehensible,
but its subsequent reaction on their exposure has been less than satisfactory.
Capitalism’s Yves Smith noted, Wells Fargo “has an annoying habit of piously claiming it
is better than other servicers when it engages in the same indefensible conduct
as its peers.” Indeed, Wells Fargo has used robo-signers to fraudulently
foreclosure on borrowers and has illegally foreclosed on military veterans. The
bank even promoted woefully unqualified employees — including one who came to
the bank from a pizza restaurant — to “vice president,”
so that they could speed more foreclosures through the pipeline.
Nevada Supreme Court is the ‘the Country’s 8th most
beholden state supreme court to the special interests.’ http://www.lvrj.com/news/nevada-ranks-8th-in-supreme-court-election-fundraising-100747864.html
The link provided in support of this statement is an article
stating that the court ranks eighth in election fundraising.
Wells Fargo knows all the same tricks that judges love to
use to favor the multi-billion-dollar, corporate ‘citizens-united’ Fortune 500
deep pockets to the detriment of 311 million fleece-able Americans by denying
them due process, fairness and right to court access.
Corrupted judges shall be indicted for official and judicial
corruption. As a matter of fact, Nevada Supreme Court’s Saitta, Douglas,
Hardesty, Gibbons, Parraguire, Pickering and Cherry are on the hook for issuing
orders for the official public record before an audience of 311 Million
Americans whose government, including the judiciary, is ‘of for and by the
people.’ (Real ones – not the Citizens-United kind).
I have proof against Wells Fargo for conspiracy to commit
racketeering, and an enormous file proving bank fraud, predatory lending, and a
myriad of other crimes against hundreds/thousands of other consumers
1. Was anything done to prevent predatory lending after Wells Fargo was discovered by the Attorney General that it has originated fraudulent mortgage loan based on inflated appraisal?
2. Why Wells Fargo EVP and General Counsel Jim Strother and Major Business Unit General Counsel David Moskowitz authorized further same toxic mortgage loan to be made after Wells Fargo received Nevada Attorney General’s ruling in suspending its hand-picked appraiser’s license for committing appraisal fraud?
3. Why did Nevada Attorney General Masto and California Attorney General Harris refuse to investigate Wells Fargo?
4. How much money was Wells Fargo getting from originating its toxic mortgage loan to homeowners then conceal the quality of its mortgage loan and sold it as mortgage-backed securities to investors since 2005?
5. Why is Nevada Supreme Court ranked 8th throughout the nation in campaign spending when running for elected Supreme Court positions?
6. Why did Nevada Supreme Court’s Pickering spend $650,000 of her own money to buy the Supreme Court seat? http://www.lvrj.com/news/nevada-ranks-8th-in-supreme-court-election-fundraising-100747864.html
Attorney General Harris and Attorney General
Masto, President Obama, please do as you promised, Prosecute and Jail "Too
To Fail" Banksters.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Justice Interpreted by Senior Staffs from the Offices of California Attorney General Harris, Nevada Attorney General Masto and Investigations Chief from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Investigations through sit-down meetings and phone conversations.
Friday, March 30, 2012
- One hour sit-down conversation with Attorney General Harris’ administrative staffs
- 45-minute phone conversation with AG Harris senior staff.
Brief summary can be found on www.NoJusticeZone.com
Thursday, April 4, 2012
- One hour sit-down conversation with Attorney General Harris’ senior staffs: one from civil division and the other from criminal division.
Brief summary can be found on www.NoJusticeZone.com
This world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything - Albert Einstein
All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
For those who care. There were two key players in hammering out 49-state $26 billion mortgage settlement. One is the California Attorney General Harris. The other is the President of Wells Fargo’s Home Mortgage Division, Mike Heid.
For those who understand. “The 49 State Attorney General Mortgage Settlement - A Detailed Analysis of The EPIC SELLOUT of The American People” http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-17-26/49-state-attorney-general-mortgage-settlement-detailed-analysis-epic-sellout-
Details of the conversation will be updated at a later date.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 – I had a 45-minute phone conversation with the Investigations Chief from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
Alert: CFPB will not intervene or issue opinion on behalf of consumers if their complaints are in litigation. Whether there is clear evidence of consumer abuse is irrelevant to CFPB.
CFPB can’t make Wells Fargo carry out its promises to my family. This is the same position taken by the Office of Comptroller of Currency (OCC).
Before litigation, OCC informed us that it had no authority to regulate Wells Fargo. After litigation, OCC claimed that it could no longer comment on our complaints because it was in litigation.
OCC is notorious in defending banking abuse rather than promoting public trust and protecting public interests.
I am deeply concerned about CFPB’s position. CFPB has shown signs of compromising to the financial institutions on several consumer protection issues. Here is a piece of information I believe every concerned American should know.
President Obama chose Richard Cordray over Elizabeth Warren as CFPB director for a very good reason. Richard Cordray, a career prosecutor is a politician. He is flexible enough not to alter the Administration’s and Department of Justice’s agenda - “Too Big To Fail” banksters IS “Too Big To Jail”.
Here is the evidence, quote from Associated Press, published on January 8, 2012.
Cordray's record has not been entirely without negatives. In 2008, while serving as Ohio treasurer, Cordray returned a $10,000 campaign contribution he had received within two weeks of taking his first state office, donated by the stepdaughter of a salesman for St. Louis, Mo.-based Wachovia Securities. In the first year of Cordray's administration, reports found Wachovia saw a 37 percent increase in its share of state bondtrading business. The salesman, Montford Will, his wife and two stepchildren were fined $125,000 in 2009 in what was believed to be the biggest case in state history of disguising campaign contributions to circumvent contribution limits. Cordray was among a host of both Democrats and Republicans who had received money from the family in the scheme.
Wells Fargo acquired Wachovia in October, 2008. My complaint is against Wells Fargo. Set aside the convenient excuses, what are the odds that CFPB will look into my complaints?
I have anticipated the results. It’s disappointing to say the least. However, it’s intriguing and troubling to actually hear how CFPB and the Attorneys General deliver and justify the positions they took.
I am going to hold off on the details of my conversation and personal opinion for a future date. Stay tuned.
Friday, April 27, 2012 – I had an hour sit-down meeting with Nevada Attorney General Masto’s senior staffs, one from the civil division and the other from the criminal division. Names withheld for the time being.
I presented my revised Open Letter to Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf and the latest email correspondence I sent to both AG Masto’s and AG Harris’ office. Both can be found on www.NoJusticeZone.com
We filed complaints against Wells Fargo for loan origination fraud and Wells Fargo’s hand-picked appraiser T.J. Magee for appraisal fraud with AG Masto’s and AG Harris’ offices in 2006.
In 2008, AG Masto’s office suspended appraiser T.J. Magee’s license for committing appraisal fraud against my family and mandated appraiser Magee to complete fraud course.
After repeated emails and phone conversations, AG Masto’s and AG Harris’ offices refused to investigate and/or prosecute Wells Fargo.
Questions I presented to AG Masto’s office on Friday, April 27, 2012.
Why did AG Masto choose to hold Wells Fargo hand-picked appraiser T.J. Magee accountable by suspending his real estate appraiser’s license for committing appraisal fraud against my family in 2008 and mandating him to complete fraud courses, but fell short in holding “Too Big To Fail” Wells Fargo accountable?
Such systemic banking abuse is a mirror image of the cause of 2008 housing crisis and financial institutions melt down. Where is the accountability?
2. Why can’t AG Masto make Wells Fargo carry out its promises to our family? Why can’t justice apply to homeowners like us? Why is Wells Fargo not prosecutable when evidence is piling sky high?
3. When Wells Fargo made a clear choice to suppress our voice and actions in putting up a good fight against its abusive, illegal and predatory lending practices, why can’t AG Masto take an affirmative stand on behalf of homeowners, expose, investigate and prosecute Wells Fargo?
Answers given by AG Masto’s senior staffs.
Whether there will be justice for my family depends on:
- Whether Nevada Supreme Court Judges will uphold the laws to hold Wells Fargo accountable for defrauding my family
- Whether Nevada Supreme Court will invite AG Masto’s office to intervene by filing an Amicus Brief on behalf of homeowners, so the Nevadans will no longer be abused by big financial institutions like Wells Fargo
AG Masto’s senior staffs are quick to point fingers at Nevada Supreme Court. Agreed, Nevada Supreme Court chose to ignore materials facts and refused to uphold the laws against Wells Fargo. What AG Masto’s senior staffs refused to admit is that her office sat on the clear evidence since 2006 and chose not to exercise her elected power and take actions against TBTF Wells Fargo. Courts’ biased rulings were not issued until 2009. AG Masto’s office had ample time (3 years) and evidence to hold Wells Fargo accountable but chose not to do anything to protect my family and the general public.
2. Advice given to me by AG’s senior staff:
- Pray that Nevada Supreme Court will view the material facts and uphold the laws, so the justice would be served.
- Accept the fact that Wells Fargo is unbeatable due to the failed system and also accept the fact that Wells Fargo has hired the “elite” army of attorneys who beat the system.
- What is not said is that AG Masto’s office witnesses daily on how Wells Fargo’s army of attorneys commit fraud on the court and abuse the judicial system, and the Office chose not to regulate and prosecute the crimes.
Quote from “Sense on Cents” - Do you feel like screaming? I do…so here goes. Barack Obama…GUTLESS!! Joe Biden…GUTLESS!! Eric Holder…GUTLESS!!
Quote from “Senses on Cents” - More than GUTLESS and LAWLESS, these individuals are all CAPTURED by the big money on Wall Street.
As such, they are little more than Wall Street “Bitches”. Do you disagree? (End Quote)
SHAMELESS, they all want my vote and your votes to put them in the OFFICE they desperately want.
Who do they vow to work for? – You and Me.
Who do they REALLY work for? - Banksters and 1%.
What shall we do under the circumstances?
It’s my job and also your job to keep our stories ALIVE! Keep our evidence RELEVANT!
We refuse to let banksters and 1% to pre-select candidates for key offices in the state and federal levels.
We will make our votes count. We will make our elected officials work for 99%. We will make it our job to make these people un-electable if they claim themselves to be good men, however choose to see no evil and do nothing to hold TBTF banksters accountable.
It’s our full-time job to make the governor, senator and president wannabes deliver the results that suit 99% before we elect them to the Office. Promises are no longer good enough for us.
It’s our full-time job to identify and reject the governor, senator and president wannabes’ campaign platforms that is NOT the most relevant to our value and our social justice system.
It’s OUR job to set up the campaign platforms for governor, senator and president wannabes. Let them go through the proper job interview before we put them in “a corner office with the view of a historic building” while we are homeless and dreamless for a better future.
Abraham Lincoln declared war against slavery and won. Now, it’s high time that we, the 99% declare war against financial slavery. I will fight for the justice for ALL, not just for the 50%, not just for the 80%, not even just for 98.999999%. It’s 99% INCLUSIVE. We are unique and powerful in our rightful ways. We need to focus on addressing the issues at stake. Our American Dream is under attack. Our quality of living is under attack. Our judicial system is under attack. 99% and 1% are no longer living by one set of rules. We shall understand the powerful definition of 99%. Unite we win. Divide we lose. Onward!
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Disable the Enablers – Raise Hell for Injustice – Wage Accountability
The Financial World We Live In When We Allow Ourselves to Be Pushed Around:
What do customer services & promises mean to Wells Fargo – Your money is my money. I am stealing your American Dream. So What? Shut up! Get used to it!
What does appraisal & loan origination fraud mean to Wells Fargo – Nothing, Absolutely Nothing!
What does breaking the laws mean to Wells Fargo – phone calls to its highly paid attorneys – Fix it & Make the illegal legal & let’s make fraud profitable!
What does breaking the laws mean to Wells Fargo – cost of doing business – “Old” News Alerts: Justice is for sale. Make the bid!
According to Kamala HarrisPedia, Catherine MastoPedia, Eric HolderPedia and President ObamaPedia, intentional fraudulent violations have new definitions - immoral, unethical and un-prosecutable!
What does banking abuse mean to Attorneys General, Department of Justice, and President Obama,
1. Excuse me, please repeat your question.
2. (Sidebar, whispering) Do you think they REALLY mean what they are asking?
3. (Final answer) Thank you for bringing the issue to our attention, we hear you, however, our hands are tied and it’s election year. We need both 99% and 1%. There is nothing we can do. Can you, the 99% wait till we settle with 1% banksters first, or at least let us get an idea how much campaign contribution we can collect for the next 6 months before ….. By the way, can you chip in for $5? …. Excuse me, what’s your question again?
The Financial World We Will Live In When We Push Back against Injustice
Expose fraud, corruption and incompetence. Result: Justices being shuffled around. It’s a matter of time before the house of card crumble.
Justice Michael Cherry Becomes Supreme Court Chief Justice Succeeding Chief Justice Nancy Saitta
Leadership at the Nevada Supreme Court changed on May 7 when Justice Michael A. Cherry assumed the administrative post of Chief Justice that has been held since September 5, 2011, by Justice Nancy Saitta.
“It is an honor to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and I will strive to maintain the high standards that Nevadans have grown to expect from our Chief Justices,” said Chief Justice Cherry, who will hold the post until January 2013.
Justice Saitta acknowledged the challenges that will face the courts during Chief Justice Cherry’s term.
The challenges will NOT be so challenging if the justices apply one set of rules for ALL. Crimes are committed on the Courts. Courts are the new CRIME SCENE. Justices have a choice to be:
○ Witnesses of the crime
○ See No Evil & Say Nothing
○ Uphold the Laws & Justice
○ Enablers of the crime
○ Pledge the Duty to $$$, Fraudsters and Banksters
○ Gatekeepers of the crime
○ Uphold the Laws & Justice
We all have choices to make, don’t we? Who will be the winner of the battle? I bet on the one who has the determination, holds the evidence and stands by the right side of the laws. Wouldn’t you?
The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don’t have any – Alice Walker
I STILL HAVE MINE! Onward & Forward!!!